An email from friend of mine really touches my heart. Just to share, we do not need to agree on it.
An economics professor at a local college made a statement that hehad never failed a single student before,but had once failed an entire class.
--------------------------------------------
That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.
The professor then said, "OK,we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan".
All grades would be averaged and everyone would receive the same grade so no one would fail and no one would receive an A.
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a B.The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.
As the second test rolled around, the students who studied littlehad studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little.The second test average was a D!No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.The scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.
All failed, to their great surprise, and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great,the effort to succeed is great but when government takes all thereward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
Could not be any simpler than that.If somebody is unable to understand THIS explanation, I have seriousdoubts about their ability to even function in society, much less runour country!
As the late Adrian Rogers said, "you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it..."Professor is a Genius
The next three years will be critical not only for the Anwar premiership,
but also for Pakatan Harapan and DAP
-
I thank the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for relaunching Kee
Thuan Chye’s two-volume biography of me and volume 2 of the Chinese
translation. I...
23 hours ago
经过三天的投票，共有27票投下。
ReplyDelete成绩分析如下：
A) 翁派的人所派放？> (33%)
B) 蔡派的人所派放？> (15%)
C) 党外人士所派放，准备坐收渔人之利？> (44%)
D) 其他 > (8%) （博主仅此致歉，由于系统出现乱码，因此无法得知这两票是说明什么。）
根据网上投票看来，还是有较多的人比较相信这次的光碟重现江湖一事，非党内人士所为，这共有44%。这也符合普遍民意，认为是有心人乘机浑水摸鱼，希望制造两败俱伤的局面。不过，MCA人马也无须过早开心，如果不是自己不争气，会有人有机会下手吗？有心人乘机推出光碟(如果真如所说的，非两派人马所为的话) 就是看死你马华自己打自己，勤练“七伤拳”，还没打到党内同志，就先自己中了内伤。
另外，相信是翁派人马所为的占有33%。这也是不可忽略的，说明不关你老总道德制高点多高，只要涉及政治斗争，没有人相信双方完全没有涉及肮脏手段。如果把这部分看成是支持蔡派者，百分率高达三成三。
接着认为是蔡派所为，所谓大打悲情牌，自己伤自己，然后再归咎对方的也高达15%。如果把这部分看成是支持翁派者，百分率高达一成五。
结论：如果以此项网上投票做为分析(当然，只是做为“学术研究”之用啦！不然，你以为….?) 翁派的死忠支持者大约有15%，而蔡派暂占上风有33%。不过别忽略了中间比较理性的44%，这一部分(segmen)者将会根据接下来的报导，在101010特大做出决定。而博主相信，讲得越多、伤得对方越多，并不代表稳胜，反而会导致反感，希望双方切记切记，点到为止就好。
《敬请浏览www.poll4malaysia.blogspot.com》